
Messier and Gretzky, in love.

The latest law proposed in
Free speech, the expression of opinion is under attack; in this case the view just happens to be particularly despicable and spiteful. I am not condoning the things that come out of these asshole’s mouths, the way they blatantly celebrate death and violence but I am standing by their right to express their concerns and hatred -- or anything else for that matter that they feel they need express. I believe that many of their views are extreme deviations from what might be have been originally grounded in honest and informed objections to Western imperialist tendencies, i.e.; war, theft, greed, murder, exploitation, etc... These deviations, once they get to the point where they praise counter-attacks and support rancour and violence are no longer rational; they’ve then strayed too far, but I repeat, to emphasize this notion: if you go back far enough most of the arguments and complaints have a semblance of genuine legitimacy. Besides, whether the argument is legitimate or not should not hinder the right to express it. I think that the ability to objectify hate is an innate right; natural and universal.
To condemn a man for his words, ideas and opinions is absolutely wrong. A man’s words should be listened to, then agreed with or disagreed with, then respectively shared or debated, liked or hated, nothing more. To punish and censor ideas, any ideas, is the greater sin.
Sad to be in-in-In this cheapened age where imitation reigns; where people frequently look on the internet to see if the moon is full –“The 4 millimetre icon says it is,” “Mom, it’s a full-moon tonight!”—and by this expressionless counterfeit all magnificence is lost.